Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
Coventry City Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 149 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

JOBS LANE NO.8 TPO 2004

reference
0308/T003
name
JOBS LANE NO.8 TPO 2004
tree-preservation-order

undefined

0308
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.574596 52.407433)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.574536 52.407433,-1.574536 52.407437,-1.574541 52.407448,-1.574554 52.407460,-1.574576 52.407468,-1.574591 52.407470,-1.574616 52.407468,-1.574635 52.407461,-1.574643 52.407456,-1.574651 52.407448,-1.574655 52.407439,-1.574654 52.407425,-1.574651 52.407419,-1.574641 52.407409,-1.574633 52.407404,-1.574624 52.407401,-1.574610 52.407397,-1.574599 52.407396,-1.574577 52.407398,-1.574560 52.407403,-1.574543 52.407415,-1.574536 52.407428,-1.574536 52.407433)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-14
start-date
2004-04-29
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The Tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

How to improve Coventry City Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL